Finland’s unique unlimited mobile data model shakes

In my latest blog post, I compared the impact of latency on user experience between fixed, 4G, and 5G networks. At the same time, The Finnish Transport and Communications Agency (Traficom) released the new and telco-neutral Speedtest, and many began to question the accuracy of these figures. Speedtest is a valid measurement tool in Finland since all providers moved to “unlimited mobile data” years ago. Subscriber pricing is based on speed, not data volume. These facts led to comparing the rate reported by Speedtest to actual data transfer. Unfortunately, the results indicate that fiber optic broadband lives up to its promises, while mobile networks must catch up. Finland’s unique unlimited mobile data model shakes.

Speedtest Results

We compared a fixed network connection to a mobile network connection. The key was to measure the values reported by Speedtest for each network and compare them to the actual data transfer speed. For both fixed and mobile network connections, the Speedtest results aligned with Traficom’s requirements and the operators’ marketing messages. However, in the case of the mobile network, the Speedtest result did not correspond to the allocated capacity for data transfer.

Speedtest vs. Actual Data Transfer (Fixed Network)

In the fixed network, the speed of Microsoft OneDrive™ data transfer (50 Mbps) matched the rate reported by the Speedtest (50 Mbps). So, it delivered value for money.

Speedtest vs. Actual Data Transfer (Mobile Network)

In the mobile network, the speed of Microsoft OneDrive™ data transfer (27.5 Mbps) was 45% lower than the speed reported by the Speedtest (50 Mbps).

Summary

Are the Speedtest results accurate? The test demonstrates that data transfer in the mobile network is restricted. The result provided by the seller or Traficom’s Speedtest software does not correspond to the speed allowed for the connection in the network. This implementation likely does not conflict with regulations, but it needs to be more accurate. In this case, the user experience of remote work raised doubts because downloading files via the mobile network took unreasonably long.

Traficom should impose similar restrictions on the Speedtest as those applied to mobile data so that the results align with reality. Finland’s unique “unlimited mobile data” model has been touted for years. It seems that Finland’s unique unlimited mobile data model shakes.

Hannu Rokka, Senior Advisor

5Feet Networks Oy